Crysis 2: PS3 Vs Xbox 360

Cmdrmonkey was talking about Crysis 2. Did you follow the discussion before posting?

 

Lol obviously but I really don't consider Crysis 2 to be on the same level as Uncharted 2.

 

Many other people do, so does GameSpot and IGN, two big reviewers. Many people read those.

 

You're the last person who can complain about that. Once again I've shown your stupidity and highlighted glaring errors within this thread and you've run away from replying. Pathetic.

 

Yeah two people like ourselves, opinion is opinion.

 

Exactly, but we two dont have much or any impact on the rest of the world. GameSpot and IGN have, though.

 

I read the Gamespot 360 review earlier and don't recall any mention of Uncharted 2 or anything like that. Care to quote?

 

Well they're opinion isn't fact either. The only facts are that Uncharted 2 is full 720p wheras Crysis 2 isn't on either console and Uncharted 2 has a solid framerate.

I'm sure any developer could create a game that looked lifelike on either console if they could go at 5fps. The true test is a solid and high framerate with excellent visuals. Crysis 2 doesn't have that.

 

I'm thinking that the Xbots didn't read DF's article at all.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-crysis2-face-off?page=2

It becomes almost unplayable on certain stages? The game is nothing if it dips down that much during intense action. This is all about performance, and that is some sorry performance. Killzone 3 & Uncharted 2 wins - hands down.

 

Crytek can't optimize worth a shit. FarCry and the original Crysis were also horribly optimized.

 

Well just read the lens of truth comparison and although I am usually sceptical about them it was an interesting read.

If the images they show are what they say they are then some scenes are better on PS3 and some on 360. It does really seem like parity.

I can't decide whether to buy this game or not, I don't often make the step down in quality and buy multi plats but this one is interesting but the res and framerate is a big downer and something Sony's studios wouldn't put upon us.

 

" I don't often make the step down in quality and buy multi plats"

Buh? Whilst I find the Sony first party exclusives to be excellent, I find it weird that someone wouldn't often pick up multiplatform games given the number of high quality titles there are.

 

I understand but let's just say I got my fingers burnt with the Orange Box so have been wary since.

The one stipulation I have is that the dev must achieve platform parity or as near as damn it. Dead Space 2 and F1: 2010 are recent multi platform purchases.

I don't buy loads of games as a lot of my time is taken up running my business so when I do find time to play it has to be worth it and I believe that PS3 exclusive games are the better option and a safe bet that they'll be very good,

 

I've bit the bullet and bought it and although it is a very good looking game I would put it behind Uncharted 2, God of War 3 and Kill Zone 3 graphically.

The texture pop in is worse than I expected and I keep seeing little glitches. Not bad for a multiplatform though.

 

I played both KZ3 and UC2, Crysis 2 looked better on PS3 then these games.

 

You've played Crysis 2 on the PS3? Oh, I see. You're talking shit again.

 

Yep i have. Your talking shit.

 

Suuuuure you have. Still, the fact you've barely played KZ3 and U2 by your own admission and the fact you're a weird, autistic like fanboy means your bound to be taken seriously.

Oh.

And if I'm talking shit I'd like examples. I've shown your fuckwittedness clearly enough recently.

 

I have played both, side by side, and Crysis 2 was clearly the big winner, like most reviewers and people have concluded.

Oh yea, example of your kiddy reactions is your very own post i quoted here.

 

Side by side too? Such commitment! Still, better to go the whole hog with the bullshit I suppose. I'm sure everyone is taking your thorough and in no way made up or plain mental analysis very seriously indeed.