Pelosi will likely be the one replacing him if he gets impeached. Pence is deeply connected to all of the corruption in his admin, so I doubt it will go to Pence.
Don't judge me... but I see Quarter Pounders, McFish, and McNuggets, Wendy's burgers and salad. I don't recognize the 2nd salad. But no Burger King. Personally, I give this troll 6/10. Should've gone Taco Bell for full 10/10.
Teflon Don skates again. Buzzfeed is in on the Trump troll. They are now 2/2 in reinforcing "fake news". Coincidence? Possible even CNN also. They gave him the most airtime back in 2015, back when FoxNews was backing actual republicans. No Trump always shouts fake news, but he name drops CNN.... a lot.
Our resident librarian AlterEgo turned out to be correct... lots of people might be go to jail. The Trump family is gonna flip on each other.
Wow, sounds like more bomb shells. I think this could be the tipping point and the beginning of the end. The walls are closing in on Trump.
The media is hyping an impeachment that is never going to happen to the point of it being fake news. That video AKS posted was amazing. The talking heads really do act like robotic NPCs from a Bethesda game.
lol @AKS. One of the best setups I've ever seen. Say all these cases go away. I just don't see how republicans can win reelection in 2020. Even middle class republicans are growing unhappy with the tax cuts. No wall. No NK deal. Is everyone tired of winning?
I don't see how Trump could LOSE in the next election. The pool of candidates the Democrats are fielding might be the weakest in history. Tulsi Gabbard could eventually be a legitimate threat down the road (I think she's only about 37 years old at the moment), but of course being the brilliant strategists the Democrats are, they're all banding together to attack her. Most of their candidates are atrocious and not well known. Rolling Stone recently ranked the potential candidates and had KAMALA HARRIS as #1. Might as well just concede today and start strategizing for 2024.
Nobody the Dems are running will get people out in big enough numbers in the right places to get elected. Trump may be unpopular with a large part of the country, but he still has a large diehard voter base that will turn out for him.
Gabbard is one of the few candidates who seems genuinely oppose ghastly globalist legislation like the Trans-Pacific Partnership. I'd typically say it's silly to be a 1-issue voter, but if I had to pick just 1, rejecting the surrender of our nation's sovereignty all the way down to the local level to corporate courts and potential destruction of the US economy is probably the way I'd go. I learned about the TPP from a member of the Green Party in 2013 on Abby Martin's former show Breaking the Set, and a few years later it was stopped by Donald Trump of all people. Strange times we live in, but I'll take those results regardless of who it's from. I'm hoping Gabbard has a chance to win in the future, but the corporate Democrats would never allow that.
Tulsi Gabbard will never get any DNC support for anything. She backed Bernie till the very end last time and they hate her for it. We were still in the LARPing stage of running for president. The final field will be much more electable. I’m thinking Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Beto O’Rourke, Joe Biden.
They are trying un-person her based on some obscure remarks she made about gays 20 years ago. Of course it's like you said, they hate her for being anti-globalist and backing Sanders. Claiming she's a homophobe even though she's not is a way to get rid of her.
Clinton's former labor secretary can give you a summary. My hometown was a manufacturing town before NAFTA. Three of the top 10 employers in my town were General Motors affiliates. After NAFTA, the town was crushed so severely that it actually decreased in population that it still has yet to recover nearly 25 years later and is in shambles economically. TPP would go substantially beyond that and in addition to making it easier to ship jobs overseas and to more places, it has absolutely ghastly provisions allowing corporate courts outside the purview or jurisdiction of government courts to sue the government or states if they determine any regulations my have interfered with their profits. It essentially surrenders US sovereignty to corporate interests, treasonous in my view that should lead to investigations of any US official supporting it.
I agree. There are more democrats than republicans and likely to be even less by election time. Trump captured a lot of "curiosity" votes the first time for various reasons. They will not be back. Texas almost went blue at the midterms, that tells you everything you need to know. About the best shot he has is if those DNC idiots push HIllary again. I will say that Dems get caught up in idealism and breaking barriers over flat out winning. They could very well do something stupid.
Someone is paying for anti-Bernie posts on Reddit. They come out of nowhere in subs/threads unrelated to politics...
This is Trump's Achilles heel. People thinking he's not as rich as he says or truly believes himself to be. Que video from @AKS
He inherited about 413 million (inflation adjusted) from his father. Doesn't seem like he actually made that much money considering what was given to him. He might have even been better off financially just doing low risk investing like money market accounts than all the stuff with real estate.